Opens in a new tab
Back to blog

ESG reforms 2025: what changes for SMEs and verification bodies in 2026

At the end of 2025, a deep transformation accelerated across the European sustainability landscape. Without spectacular announcements, through legislative adjustments and regulatory refinement, the ESG world companies had been navigating for several years began to change. For many leaders — especially in SMEs — the shift felt like relief after years of confusion.

For a long time, ESG expectations grew faster than companies could absorb them: new acronyms, client questionnaires, ratings, banking requirements. Large groups adapted with dedicated teams; SMEs spun in circles under rising pressure without a coherent framework.

Then came 2025 and what many call a reset. The European Commission, after hearing from trade federations, accounting firms and verification bodies, recognised an essential point: the existing framework was too heavy for many companies — technically correct, but operationally overwhelming. The adjustment package known as Omnibus revised thresholds, simplified certain obligations and offered more flexibility to smaller structures.

In parallel, ESG ratings — long criticised for their opacity — came under ESMA supervision. The ESG ratings regulation, fully applicable in July 2026, requires agencies to justify their methods, guarantee impartiality and accept structured oversight. That transforms not only the agencies, but the entire assurance and verification ecosystem that feeds them.

What makes this moment singular is the simultaneous double movement. On one side, SMEs gain clarity; on the other, large companies subject to detailed reporting will continue to demand reliable information from suppliers. Banks, insurers and investors will not relax their ESG criteria because SME obligations were lightened. On the contrary: as data quality becomes central to regulated ratings, pressure for accurate, consistent and traceable information will increase across value chains.

SMEs that interpret simplification as a signal to ignore ESG therefore risk falling behind. The 2025 reforms do not erase expectations: they reorganise them. They offer a clearer path, but not permission to stop midway. In 2026, SMEs that structure their processes and strengthen competitiveness will stand out; passive ones will struggle to keep up in a market that uses sustainability as a trust criterion.

Verification and accreditation bodies are also entering a period of intense change. The new framework for rating agencies creates a domino effect: need for verified information, stronger governance, more demanding documentation for both verifiers and accreditors.

In this context, support becomes central. SMEs need complexity translated into clarity; verification bodies need to strengthen their ISO 17029 and related systems. Eco Fluent Solutions sits at that intersection — helping companies build simple but credible ESG systems, and verification bodies consolidate their compliance.

In 2026, the question is no longer whether ESG is mandatory, but whether it can become an advantage. The 2025 reforms made that possible. Companies that seize this moment will not merely meet expectations: they will strengthen their competitiveness.

The future of ESG in Europe is not softening: it is maturing. It is becoming more predictable, more structured and more integrated into trust assessment. Sustainability is no longer a reporting exercise: it is a credibility marker — and credibility becomes the currency of business in 2026.

Support for SMEs: find out how to structure your ESG and VSME questionnaire responses.